המתמטיקה שבפסטה

סמוך על מתמטיקאים שלא יסתפקו בלסתום אתהפה בפסטה אלא יתעקשו לתאר את הצורה שלה מתמטית , ויגיעו לכמה תוצאות שמתוארות להלן :

סירטון – האושר שבספרים

 

צוללת השבוע

פרויקט הילדים הבא שלי

 

מומחית הדינוזאורים

ילדה בת 4 מסבירה לאבא שלה את הטעויות בצעצוע

הבנאים של המחר

ארכיטקט שוויצרי בנה מגדל לבנים עם מעין הליקופטורים רובוטיים :

וכך נראה המגדל הסופי :

שני קוריאנים רוצים לבנות מגדלים עם להק דבורים מכניות :

וכך יראה אתר הבניה :

 

הבניין יפהפה ,

הכתבה כולל פרטים על איך נמנעו הרובוטים מהתנדשויות וכד'

ידידו הטוב ביותר של הרווק הפרה היסטורי

היכן אני משיג לי אחד כזה ?

טיילו בחורבות סאן פרנסיסקו

לא , לא הרסנו אותה

ב 1906 נהרסה סן פרנסיסקו ברעידת אדמה

ניתן לסייר בפנורמה של ההרס

לפיקניק הבא נהיה מוכנים

צבא ארה"ב פיתח סנדביץ' שמחזיק מעמד עד 3 שנים

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15987343

והחיילים טוענים שהטעם נורמלי, לטיול הבא עם הילדים…..

ככה קוטלים ספר

ציטוט מביקורת על ספר בירחון חקר קופים ( פריימטולוגיה ( :

This is a book that contradicts itself a hundred times; but that is not a criticism of it, because its author thinks contradictions are a sign of intellectual ferment and vitality. This is a book that systematically distorts and selects historical evidence; but that is not a criticism, because its author thinks that all interpretations are biased, and she regards it as her duty to pick and choose her facts to favor her own brand of politics. This is a book full of vaporous, French-intellectual prose that makes Teilhard de Chardin sound like Ernest Hemingway by comparison; but that is not a criticism, because the author likes that sort of prose and has taken lessons in how to write it, and she thinks that plain, homely speech is part of a conspiracy to oppress the poor. This is a book that clatters around in a dark closet of irrelevancies for 450 pages before it bumps accidentally into its index and stops; but that is not a criticism, either, because its author finds it gratifying and refreshing to bang unrelated facts together as a rebuke to stuffy minds. This book infuriated me; but that is not a defect in it, because it is supposed to infuriate people like me, and the author would have been happier still if I had blown out an artery. In short, this book is flawless, because all its deficiencies are deliberate products of art. Given its assumptions, there is nothing here to criticize. The only course open to a reviewer who dislikes this book as much as I do is to question its author’s fundamental assumptions—which are big-ticket items involving the nature and relationships of language, knowledge, and science.

גדול , ככה קוטלים ספר.

מה לעזאזל בונים הסינים במדבר

זה מאמר מגיזמודו שאני מדביק פה במלואו כי השאלה במקומה מונחת , מה לעזאזל בונים הסינים במדבר ?

אגב החביב ביותר עלי הנו האחרון

http://gizmodo.com/5859081/why-is-china-building-these-gigantic-structures-in-the-middle-of-the-desert

By Jesus Diaz

Why Is China Building These Gigantic Structures In the Middle of the Desert? (Update 3)

This is crazy. New photos have appeared in Google Maps showing unidentified titanic structures in the middle of the Chinese desert. The first one is an intricate network of what appears to be huge metallic stripes. Is this a military experiment?

Update 1 & 2: readers are finding even more weird stuff.
Update 3: some unidentified agency, company or person has been ordering hundreds of photographs of this area since 2004. Check out that story here.

They seem to be wide lines drawn with some white material. Or maybe the dust have been dug by machinery.

It's located in Dunhuang, Jiuquan, Gansu, north of the Shule River, which crosses the Tibetan Plateau to the west into the Kumtag Desert. It covers an area approximately one mile long by more than 3,000 feet wide.

The tracks are perfectly executed, and they seem to be designed to be seen from orbit.

Perhaps it's some kind of targeting or calibrating grid for Chinese spy satellites? Maybe it's a QR code for aliens? Nobody really knows.

You can check it out yourself in Google Maps here.

The second structure seems to be some kind of giant targeting grid, also north of the Shule river.

If you zoom in, you can see vehicles destroyed. It's west of what seems to be a fairly big electrical station or a radio station similar to HAARP, the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program located near Gakona, Alaska, and funded by the US Air Force, the US Navy, the University of Alaska, and DARPA.

You can investigate here and tell us what you think in the comments.

The third one I don't know what the hell it is either, and it's perhaps the craziest of them all: Thousand of lines intersecting in a titanic grid that is about 18 miles long. Another targeting grid? A big practical joke? You can inspect it here. [Google Maps, Google Maps and Google Maps via Reddit]

Update: Readers are finding more weird stuff.

A grid similar to the first one is located here.

This one seems like another target, this time arranged radially, with planes and obstacles.

Here is a weird airport-like structure. Except it's bright cyan. Seems full of water or made of a weird material. And look at the other airport-like structure next to it. Perhaps a decoy?

This is a huge complex, ten by five miles at least. Are these huge precipitation pools of some kind? If you zoom in Google Maps (see the image below this one), you could see two cooling towers like those used in nuclear plants, as well as several water treatment plants.

The Chinese have been building huge structures in the desert for a long time. Back in 2006, they built this 1:20 scale model of disputed border region between China and India. That's a terrain model 0.7 kilometer wide by almost 1 kilometer tall. Uncanny. Why would they build such a model of a terrain? To play a 1:20 scale war with 1:20 scale tanks? Mind boggling.